|
ID # |
MASS (KG) |
VOL (CC) |
INTACTNESS SCORE |
FINAL SCORE |
COMMENTS |
|
|
zero3 |
0.044 |
1140 |
5 |
0.098 |
Too much packing material, crushing the chip. It broke into 3
pieces |
|
12 |
0.011 |
720 |
1 |
0.125 |
More bubble wrap might have helped. It broke into too many
pieces |
|
17 |
0.027 |
459 |
5 |
0.406 |
A sturdier box might have protected the chip better. |
|
333 |
0.01 |
404 |
5 |
1.23 |
Pringle chip did not make it to KY in one piece. We found it in
4 sig. parts Right idea, not enough support.At least it was not
potato dust! |
|
zero1 |
0.061 |
580 |
100 |
2.82 |
Box looked nice, but the box might have added to mass. Liked the
idea but if you would have cut the box in half then you could
have cut down in mass and volume |
|
99 |
0.257 |
3168 |
100 |
0.122 |
mass and volume were significantly high, even though the chip
arrived intact, the size took away from the overall score |
|
77 |
0.029 |
1380 |
100 |
2.5 |
the chip was perfect and the it was a great idea but the
styrofoam could have been reduced in size because it increased
the mass of package. |
|
82 |
0.063 |
470 |
100 |
3.37 |
Idea was good but the decorations took away from total score. We
weighed package w/o it and it reduced mass by 9 grams. Good
work! |
|
777 |
0.094 |
716 |
10 |
0.148 |
We liked the idea but the chip needed more support. It was split
in half. |
|
26 |
0.006 |
28.5 |
100 |
1.68 |
The styrofoam was a good idea |
|
555 |
0.022 |
213 |
100 |
2.13 |
Your chip survived and we loved your idea. It was really light
and you did a great job |
|
18 |
0.047 |
213 |
100 |
9.9 |
Great idea! Liked how you used bubble wrap and cotton. Less tape
would decrease mass. |
|
55 |
0.041 |
660 |
10 |
0.369 |
Very good, but it boke in half. Good idea. We thought feathers
would not have supported it enough. |
|
314 |
0.017 |
163 |
100 |
35.9 |
I liked how the string was fastend like a seatbelt in a car.
Great Score |
|
20 |
0.013 |
500 |
100 |
15.38 |
your design was crative, you did a great job! |
|
23 |
0.017 |
1950 |
1 |
0.302 |
Great idea! But it failed soldier! The chip was in smithereens |
|
15 |
0.027 |
480 |
100 |
7.71 |
It was fantastic! just like our first idea. A little less tape
would have decreased the mass. |
|
10 |
0.048 |
357 |
5 |
0.29 |
More packing not wrapping. Loved the wrapping not the packing :) |
|
619 |
0.016 |
240 |
100 |
2.68 |
Great job. Liked the idea about the bubble wrap and styrofoam
surrounding it |
|
725 |
0.024 |
522 |
10 |
0.78 |
Good job but needed more support around the chip. |
|
221 |
0.026 |
217 |
100 |
17.6 |
Very nice job! Super job! |
|
88 |
0.026 |
276 |
100 |
13.9 |
Great idea! With the cotton balls |
|
0.1 |
0.025 |
540 |
100 |
7.4 |
It was a good packing job. Nice container. |
|
94.5 |
0.05 |
2050 |
1 |
0.00097 |
We "got what you were trying to do but it did not work as
planned. It was potato dust good try chip partner |
|
14 |
0.022 |
969 |
100 |
4.69 |
The pringle came out great There were no cracks or anyting. |
|
8 |
0.041 |
1800 |
100 |
1.35 |
Very well packed. Marvelous thinking, one of the best ideas that
I have seen. The chip never moved |
|
24 |
0.0231 |
574 |
100 |
7.57 |
Nice work, it was neatly packed |
|
13 |
0.022 |
238 |
50 |
9.56 |
Good idea, Slightly cracked on top Great work |
|
137 |
0.052 |
1160 |
100 |
1.65 |
Well done, great job! |
|
101 |
0.016 |
650 |
10 |
0.961 |
We would have put more protection over the pringle and used
softer materials. |
|
134 |
0.037 |
1848 |
100 |
1.46 |
Good work, we used water displacement to measure volume! |
|
4 |
0.027 |
374 |
1 |
0.1 |
I liked the idea but was surprised to find potato dust, perhaps
next tome you should provide more protection |
|
3 |
0.023 |
750 |
100 |
5.79 |
What a unique idea. It was perfection! |
|
27 |
0.022 |
200 |
10 |
2.27 |
The rubberband put too much on the chip. This may have created
enough tension to hurt the chip |
|
37 |
0.045 |
288 |
100 |
7.71 |
Unusual idea but it worked well. |
|