|
ID # |
MASS (KG) |
VOL (CC) |
INTACTNESS SCORE |
FINAL SCORE |
COMMENTS |
|
7-2 (duct tape) |
0.122 |
832 |
10 |
0.0985 |
They should have packed it in cotton balls instead of
peanuts.Packed in tighter. More trials. Good Try |
|
|
|
|
|
|
They should have packed it in tighter and did more test runs
until it was perfect. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8-3 |
0.153 |
1490 |
100 |
0.439 |
Nice job. Good Idea. Maybe try something besides a Pringles
container. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7-2 (white box w/clear packing tape) |
0.0695 |
927 |
100 |
1.55 |
I think it was obviously smart because
the chip was perfectly intact, but I think the mass was higher
than necessary due to the amount of cotton balls. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was good, but they increased the
mass too much because of too much tape and too many cotton
balls. The idea of using the Pringles case was a good one; we
thought of it as well but didn't use it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good, but didn't need so many cotton
balls (add to mass). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8-8 |
0.105 |
1410 |
5 |
0.0338 |
There was not variety in packaging material. However, it was
very light. |